- Adobe premiere pro mac vs pc pro#
- Adobe premiere pro mac vs pc software#
- Adobe premiere pro mac vs pc Pc#
- Adobe premiere pro mac vs pc windows#
Those mobile devices are drawing programmer attention along with consumers' time and money, and earlier market power is no guarantee for success in the new market. Microsoft and Adobe both have businesses tightly linked with the old era of personal computers, but they're trying to expand to the new era of tablets and smartphones, too. The partnership, while unusual for the creative domain, makes sense for two companies struggling to adapt to new computing realities. "I'm sure you'll be really excited to see what's happening." "Go ahead, give it a spin, and try it on Windows," he said.
Adobe premiere pro mac vs pc software#
Narayen, too, exhorted them to try Adobe software on a Microsoft foundation.
Adobe premiere pro mac vs pc pro#
A Surface Pro 3 costs $800 for a lower-end configuration, and another $129 for the detachable keyboard. The attendees greeted Nadella's promotional largesse with a standing ovation. "I'd like to give each one of you a Surface Pro 3 to take with you to get started," Nadella said, throwing a year's subscription to the Office Pro 365 software into the mix. And Nadella announced a big incentive to lure the thousands in attendance into the Microsoft fold. Microsoft Chief Executive Satya Nadella took the stage with his Adobe counterpart, Shantanu Narayen, to announce the deal on Monday at Adobe's annual Max conference in Los Angeles.
Adobe premiere pro mac vs pc windows#
But the company just announced a partnership with Microsoft that aims to bring some of that attention to Microsoft's Windows operating system and Surface Pro tablet-laptop hybrids. Macs, iPhones and iPads are often the computers of choice for the creative sort that Adobe Systems caters to. And given that NVIDIA owns ARM now, there should be some much tighter and more optimised GPU integration in the future, too.A Microsoft Surface Pro 3 running a touch-enabled version of Adobe Illustrator looms above, from left to right, Adobe digital media leader David Wadhwani, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, and Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen. It’s very exciting to see what will come in the future from Apple, but with ARM-based Windows finally getting x86 64-Bit emulation Windows might be able to catch up on performance per dollar. I still can’t see myself switching over to Apple just yet. It was interesting to see a real-world comparison like this. Surprisingly, the M1 actually seemed to perform quite well, if you put all the settings sliders down to “Potato”. They also did some stuff with gaming, if that’s your thing.
Performing the same edits as Resolve, there was no slowdown at all scrubbing through the timeline and the final render came out at 47 seconds – faster than DaVinci Resolve on either system. What was impressive, and an area where the M1 won by default because it’s not available on the PC, was Final Cut Pro performance.
The M1 iMac wasn’t far behind though, at a minute and 4 seconds.
Adobe premiere pro mac vs pc Pc#
The Intel PC managed it in a very speedy 56 seconds. There were some noticeable performance slowdowns with both systems, but neither really performed any worse than the other.įor rendering a 30-second clip containing two 5.9K 24fps 10-bit 4:2:0 files, sampled down to 4K 24fps H.264 was sent to both machines and they were left to render. To put them to the test, though, they threw some 5.9K 24fps, 10-bit 4:2:0 footage from the Panasonic S1H at them with some multitrack picture-in-picture. They didn’t test Premiere Pro, because apparently, they’re not big fans of Premiere Pro. When it comes to video, DaVinci Resolve was the main comparison between the two.
Obviously, in these first couple of examples, Lightroom is optimised more for Intel-based systems while Capture One’s M1 optimisation is very impressive. I think this lends itself well to demonstrating how well optimised certain applications are for specific platforms. When it came to Capture One, though, the results were a little closer. It was basically twice as fast (which you’d expect if you’re paying twice as much). But is it? The Windows laptop hammered the M1 desktop in the Lightroom test. With that massive price difference, it seems a bit of an unfair comparison, really. It’s half the price of Chris’ laptop, at $1,699 and features an 8-core M1, 16GB RAM and a 256GB SSD. Coming in at $3,499 (although it’s currently available for $2,999), it’s not an inexpensive machine, by any stretch of the imagination. Jordan’s 24″ M1 iMac, on the other hand, is significantly less expensive. Chris’ PC in this case is the Gigabyte Aero 15 YB, with an 11th Gen Intel i9 CPU, 32GB RAM and NVIDIA RTX 3080 GPU with 8GB RAM.
0 kommentar(er)
